Man who finds Finger in Yogurt should be force to give his
Published on May 6, 2005 By sushiK In Current Events
RALEIGH, North Carolina (AP) -- To a dessert shop customer, the severed fingertip found in a pint of frozen custard could be worth big dollars in a potential lawsuit. To the shop worker who lost it, the value is far more than monetary.

But Clarence Stowers still has the digit, refusing to return the evidence so it could be reattached. And now it's too late for doctors to do anything for 23-year-old Brandon Fizer.

"I'm not saying who has it, but somebody has it," Stowers said this week in a telephone interview, refusing to let on where the fingertip is now.

Soon after Stowers found the finger in a mouthful of chocolate soft-serve he bought Sunday at Kohl's Frozen Custard in Wilmington, he put it in his freezer at home, taking it out only occasionally to show to television cameras.

He refused to give it to the shop's owner, and refused to give it to a doctor who was treating Fizer, who accidentally stuck his hand in a mixing machine and had his right index finger lopped off at the first knuckle.

Medical experts say an attempt to reattach a severed finger can generally be made within six hours.

But according to the shop's management, Stowers wouldn't give it back when he was in the store 30 minutes after the accident.

"The general manager attempted to retrieve it and rush it to the hospital," reads a statement posted Thursday on Kohl's Web site. "Unfortunately, the customer refused to give it to her and declared that he would be calling the TV stations and an attorney as he exited the store."

Officials at Cape Fear Hospital said their efforts to retrieve the finger also failed.

Dr. James Larson, director of emergency medicine for UNC Hospitals, who was not involved in the case, said once Stowers took the finger home and froze it, it was too late to even try for reattachment.

"You can't freeze it. It kills the cells," Larson said.

The doctor said the best way to preserve a severed limb is to wrap it in saline-soaked gauze, place it in a plastic bag and store that in ice water.

Stowers' attorney, Lee Andrews of Greensboro, wouldn't say if a lawsuit against Kohl's is planned, saying he needed "to get some more facts."

But Andrews said his client is concerned about possible disease in the fingertip and kept it because he wanted someone to test it for "all the diseases that are out here now."

"He's upset to the point that he's been debilitated to some degree," Andrews said. "Emotionally, it's been very upsetting to him."

Even if Stowers decides to sue, an expert in medical law said the fingertip could easily have been returned while preserving the evidence.

"The man who lost the finger has the superior claim," said Paul Lombardo, who teaches at the University of Virginia's law school. "It's his finger and he might be able to use it."

Lombardo said Stowers could have photographed the fingertip, taken a bit of flesh for DNA analysis or gotten an affidavit from the surgeon who would have reattached the digit.

"There is nothing that would prevent preserving the chain of evidence," Lombardo said.

Fizer is dealing with his loss in private. The Carolina Beach resident's mother, Sheri Fizer, said the family had been instructed by an attorney not to talk about the case.

Public opinion seemed to be running against Stowers.

"It's a mystery how that customer can live with himself after he refused to return the finger so that doctors might try to reattach it," said an editorial Thursday by the Star-News of Wilmington.

"Unless he offers a better explanation for that decision, people will assume that customer Clarence Stowers cared less about another person's loss of a body part than about his chance to squeeze some bucks out of the custard stand."

The case came not long after a Las Vegas woman made headlines with a claim that she found a finger tip in a bowl of chili at a Wendy's restaurant in San Jose, Calif. Investigators have called her claim a hoax and charged her in connection with millions of dollars in losses to Wendy's in northern California. The woman denies it was a hoax.

For Kohl's, Sunday's fingertip amputation was the second time in less than a year that a worker lost a finger on the same frozen custard machine. The worker was found by investigators to have been negligent in the July 2004 incident, and the state Labor Department cleared the company of wrongdoing.


This prick who found the finger and refused to give it back in time to the kid to have it reattached should be force to cut off his own
The nerve of this guy! Now this poor guy who was making 5.50 an hour is missing part of his finger cause some dumbass wouldn't give it back.

Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on May 06, 2005
I'm going to sue you for stealing my article
on May 06, 2005
I'm going to sue you for stealing my article


You can have it, I'm not even sure What we are arguing at this point here
on May 06, 2005
As none of us were actually there at the time all of these statements about "woulda coulda shoulda" are only speculation. If the store was really busy it's possible that the product in question could have been sold/served before anyone other than the injured guy knew what had happened.

It's also possible that the injured employee didn't have the presence of mind to do anything but rush away from the station to find the manager and seek treatment.

Truth is, none of us knows what REALLY happened in the time between the injury and the serving of the product (which could have been mere seconds) so this silly bickering about it is just, well, silly.
on May 06, 2005
Man works machine.

Man loses fingertip.

Man say "Yeeeowwwww".

Man thinks, "Drat, my fingertip is in that ice cream. I want my finger back."

Store ignores the fact the ice cream he is working on is now a BIOHAZARD.

Store doesn't bother with finger, packs icecream, and sells it anyway.

Man blames person who finds finger in a mouthful of ice cream.

*boggle*

I repeat, not only would I not give him back his finger, I would probably see to it that a fingertip is the least of his worries. Priorities, folks. The store sold bloody ice cream, and man #2 ATE bloody ice cream. Where should your sympathy lie here??? There's no way they'd get the evidence of their CRIME back...
on May 06, 2005

Wahh?

What crime did the guy who lost a finger commit? Name it?

Yes - Did the Place became a BioHazard?
Yes - Will The Man who found the finger in his ice Cream or whatever sue?
Yes - Does The manager of the place have full culpability?
No - Did The guy whos finger it was commit a crime?
Yes - Should the finger finder have given back the finger?
Yes - Should the finger finder now face a suit?

Your sympathy lies with a person who thought it was more important to keep evidence to prove their case when suing to make money over giving the finger back to the rightful owner who did nothing more wrong then extend his finger a little too far into a squishy machine.

Apu says shame on this man.
on May 06, 2005

Man works machine.

Man loses fingertip.

Man say "Yeeeowwwww".

Man thinks, "Drat, my fingertip is in that ice cream. I want my finger back."
******** You are assuming he knew it was in the icecream, maybe he thought he had just cut it **************


Store ignores the fact the ice cream he is working on is now a BIOHAZARD.
******** Bingo, store is at fault, not the finger loser *******


Store doesn't bother with finger, packs icecream, and sells it anyway.
******** We really don;t know what transpired after **************

Man blames person who finds finger in a mouthful of ice cream.
********* He wanted his finger put back on his body, this really should have been first priority ****************

*boggle* - indeed



Finger loser say - "Please give me back my finger so I can attach it"
Finger finder says - "F Off, i need this to make money"

** Double Boggle **
on May 06, 2005
We know EXACTLY what transpired. WHY it happened isn't the least bit important.

Once an employee contaminates your product, you don't sell it. You do, you screw the employee, you screw yourself. Either the store didn't want to lose the money, or they were too stupid to wonder what happened to it. Instead of trashing the product and finding the guy's finger, they had to make a few bucks off the ice cream.

Either way, the employee should be pissed at his store, not the victim of their negligence. If he lost enough finger to re-attach, (FIRST KNUCKLE??!!?!) then you can be damn sure he knew it was gone before he left the store. I have ZERO sympathy. If it was in ice cream for more than a few minutes it was frozen, anyway.

Rightful owner? Heck, if I pay for ice cream with a finger in it, the finger is mine. I might have it made into a paper weight. Or maybe stuffed to hang on the wall. Regardless, the guy wouldn't get it back, whether I sued or not.
on May 06, 2005
Maybe make it into a back scratcher... Yeah. Regardless, I think you are dead on with the "F*ck Off" thing. Would probably be my exact words.
on May 06, 2005
but why punish the guy who lost it?

If you went to Benny Hana's and the guy at the grill chopping, slicing and shooting freshly cooked shrimp into people's mouths accidentally shot his own chopped-off-finger into your mouth instead of a juicy shrimp.

You would stand there in front of the Chef and say "ummm no, i need this..."

By the way I am sitting here at work laughing my ass off at where this conversation has turned!
on May 06, 2005
"If you went to Benny Hana's and the guy at the grill chopping, slicing and shooting freshly cooked shrimp into people's mouths accidentally shot his own chopped off finger into your mouth instead of a shrimp.

You would stand there in front of the Chef and say "ummm no, i need this..."


Are we talking teriyaki? Tough one...

" but why punish the guy who lost it?"


Maybe this comes from actually witnessing someone lose a finger and knowing other people who have. If you lose a finger at the first knuckle, you KNOW you lost the finger. The guy in my case was pretty hurt and sick, sure, but he was damned insistant on taking it with him.

In the end it was too mangled to re-attach. There weren't like paramedics there, and it took us about 5 minutes to get it wrapped and in ice water for him. His life wouldn't have been threatened had it taken even longer.

People have cut their own arm off with a pocket knife in the wilderness and made it back. There's no reason they couldn't have torn down the machine and gotten this guy his finger before he left.

By the time someone gets it home and takes a bite of it, the negligence on either side is already decided. I'll grant you two victims here, but the guy who lost a finger handed the responsibility of re-attachment over to the store when he left, and they let him down.
on May 06, 2005
I'll grant you two victims here, but the guy who lost a finger handed the responsibility of re-attachment over to the store when he left, and they let him down.


I will agree with you on there

Teriyaki all the way
on May 06, 2005
"I was able to first snap the radius and then within another few minutes snap the ulna at the wrist and from there, I had the knife out and applied the tourniquet and went to task. It was a process that took about an hour," Ralston recounted matter-of-factly.

His ordeal didn't end with the surgery. After freeing himself from the boulder, Ralston still had to crawl through a narrow, winding canyon, rappel down a 60-foot cliff and walk six miles through the park."


Kind of makes sitting and waiting for them to find your finger seem a bit petty...
on May 06, 2005

But if another hiker pushed the boulder over, carried the hand down to the hospital, said Look waht i found!
Man who cut off hand "Can you have it?"
Other Hiker - "Uumm no..., i want it"

Ahh just a little tongue in cheek humor
on May 06, 2005

The customer should be ashamed of himself for putting a fast buck over a man's right and dignity for 10 full fingers.

Rightful owner? Heck, if I pay for ice cream with a finger in it, the finger is mine.

I had that same thought.  the guy actually paid for the finger.  Awful thought, but it's true.

If it were me, and the awful world we live in, my first concern would be my own health.  I would be keeping the "evidence" to have tests done on to make sure that I wasn't exposed to AIDs or some other disease.

Face it people, the finger was most likely wasted, anyway.  In the original article: "Medical experts say an attempt to reattach a severed finger can generally be made within six hours." "An attempt" can be made.  First, the finger was in ice cream.  Which means that it was most likely frozen and contaminated due to being, well, in ice cream.  It was also contaminated by being in a human mouth. 

I also look at it from the customers view.  He was probably amazingly freaked out.  How many people can think straight when they just found a body part in the food they put in their mouth?  The articles also doesn't mention police.  I wonder why they didn't try to get the police to get the finger?  Were they afraid to get the police involved? 

The customer has also not officially filed a lawsuit.  It's not even sure if he will.

This is the *second* time that somebody lost a finger in that store.  Focusing on the actions of the customer is absurd.

 

on May 06, 2005

** Rightful owner? Heck, if I pay for ice cream with a finger in it, the finger is mine. **

I don't know if you order a burger and the burger flipper drops his keys under the bun, do you get to keep his car?
3 Pages1 2 3