Published on September 8, 2005 By sushiK In Current Events
Florida court upholds veil ban

Muslim woman sued over driver's license photo

Wednesday, September 7, 2005; Posted: 5:27 p.m. EDT (21:27 GMT)

DAYTONA BEACH, Florida (AP) -- A Muslim woman who, for religious reasons, wanted to wear a veil in her driver's license photo must follow a Florida law that requires a picture of her full face, a state appeals court ruled.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal upheld a 2003 ruling by an Orlando judge that Sultaana Freeman's right to free exercise of religion would not be burdened by the photo requirement.

"We recognized the tension created as a result of choosing between following the dictates of one's religion and the mandates of secular law," Appellate Judge Emerson R. Thompson Jr. wrote in Friday's opinion. "However, as long as the laws are neutral and generally applicable to the citizenry, they must be obeyed."

Freeman's attorney, Howard Marks, said Wednesday he was considering an appeal. He said the decision didn't respect the state constitution's guarantee of religious freedom.

The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles issued Freeman, 38, a license in 2001 showing her veiled with only her eyes visible, but later suspended it.

Freeman sued, claiming the suspension infringed upon her First Amendment rights.

In 2003, Circuit Judge Janet C. Thorpe agreed with authorities that letting people show only their eyes would undermine efforts to stop terrorists. That same year, Gov. Jeb Bush signed legislation requiring a picture of a driver's full face on a license.

The appeals court found enforcement of the law "did not compel Freeman to engage in conduct that her religion forbids -- her religion does not forbid all photographs."

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be


I thought it was absolute insanity last year when this became an issue. I was worried the the PC'ification of America would allow this woman to win and open the flood gates for all other kinds of personal religious loopholes.

I am happy on many levels that it was finally squashed; does this mean that America is finally coming round to it's senses?
Is there anyone who even remotely thinks this is unfair?

Comments
on Sep 08, 2005
Nope. The purpose in the photo is to see to it a driver carrying the card is the one who passed the test to drive. If you could wear a veil, then anyone could slap on a veil and use one another's license.

To me, this is kind of like an Amish person suing the military for going to war and disqualifying them for military service. In order to drive you have to have a license. If your religious beliefs prevent you from being licensed, then they also prevent you from driving.
on Sep 08, 2005
Every once in awhile, the courts make sense.
on Sep 08, 2005
Finally a judge with common sense. I'm sure the ACLU and cair will step in and claim racism against islam.
on Sep 08, 2005
darn now I have to throw away all my pretty veils. shoot!!